Liberal Judge Follows Dangerous Anti-Constitutional Precedent

Since the inauguration of Donald Trump as America’s 45th president, a host of liberal judges have been following a dangerous anti-constitutional precedent.

Most of these judges were appointed by Barack Obama or Bill Clinton, both liberal anti-constitutional socialist politicians who worked to undermine the Constitution and rule of law. These judges are using their positions on federal court benches to push their anti-constitutional ideology instead of ruling on the Constitution and federal laws. These judges have placed themselves OVER the President of the United States, something our Founding Fathers went to great lengths to prevent.

You Might Like

Our Founding Fathers purposely created a three-branched government with the judiciary branch being the least powerful of the three. Their purpose was to protect the Constitution and rule of law. Today, these judges are assuming the greatest power within the US government and it’s usually due to political preferences and not the rule of law.

Barack Obama appointed over 300 federal judges in his attempt to change the political landscape of America from a constitutional country to a socialist country controlled by an elite few.

In the latest example is US District Judge Jon Tigar, a judge of the US District Court for the Northern District of California. He is based in Oakland, was appointed by Obama in June 2012, confirmed by the Senate in December 2012 and was commissioned to the court in January 2013. Before his nomination to the federal court by Obama, Tigar served judge on the Alameda County Superior Court. Thus his liberal Democratic background.

Last Monday, Tigar took it upon himself to place an injunction to block the Trump administration’s plan to stop many of the migrants at the southern border from seeking asylum in the United States.

Tigar actually placed his initial injunction against the plan to block asylum seekers back in July, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals modified his injunction to only those states within the jurisdiction of the appeals court. Arizona and California, but not New Mexico or Texas.

In last Monday’s ruling, Tigar overruled the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, saying that the policy needs to be uniform nationwide.

What makes Tigar’s actions so dangerous, as well as the actions of so many other liberal judges, are that they are assuming far more authority than the Constitution gives them. As I stated earlier, they are wrongfully using their positions to push a political ideology regardless of what the Constitution or federal law states. In essence, they are creating law, something the Founding Fathers intentionally strove to prevent.

Never in the history of the United States have so many politically driven judges abused their positions for political purposes than in the last two and half years. They are setting a dangerous precedent that basically renders the Constitution and federal law null and void.

I wish someone in the Trump administration would READ the US Constitution, Article III, Section 1, which reads, in part:

The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,…

When these judges use their federal position to push a political ideology instead of ruling on law, they are NO LONGER acting in good behavior and therefore should be removed from the bench!