source link go to site click here reddit homework help subreddit gi joe generique viagra argument essay example topics for an annotated marc-antoine laugier essay on architecture 1753 cultures clash essay best article ghostwriting websites au emory dissertation guidelines an essay on man epistle 2 interpretation albert camus the myth of sisyphus essay easy english language news paper essay building 18 year old take viagra bishop ready high school homework online my love for nature essay il cialis fa bene alla circolazione a quick introduction about myself essay loyola university new orleans creative writing augmentin dog dosage purchase college papers can college essays go over 500 words iv administration lasix alli not working viagra etymology China took a dig at the United States over the situation in Afghanistan on Tuesday after Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Beijing during her tour of Southeast Asia.

Harris is headed for Vietnam ahead of meetings with top officials in Hanoi on August 25, but in a speech before departing Singapore on Tuesday, she offered her strongest rebuke yet of what she described as the Chinese government’s coercion and intimidation in the South China Sea.

“Beijing’s actions continue to undermine the rules-based order and threaten the sovereignty of nations,” she said. “The United States stands with our allies and partners in the face of these threats.”

In addition to making what could be considered her most important foreign policy speech since taking office, Harris’ tour of Southeast Asia—as President Joe Biden’s most senior cabinet official—is seen as an effort to signal continued U.S. commitments to the region as developments inevitably become overshadowed by events in Afghanistan.

But in a sharp retort a few hours later, China’s Foreign Ministry referenced the chaotic scenes in Kabul and suggested Washington, D.C., had lost all its credibility because of its botched withdrawal from Afghanistan.

“The current events in Afghanistan clearly demonstrate the U.S.’s so-called rules and order,” ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin fired back during a regular pressing briefing in Beijing.

“The U.S. can willfully intervene militarily in a sovereign country and not bear responsibility for the suffering of the country’s people. The U.S. can came and go as it pleases without considering the opinions of the international community or even its allies,” he continued.

“To maintain ‘America first,’ the U.S. can wantonly smear, suppress, coerce and bully other countries without paying any price. This is the order the U.S. wants,” he added. “The U.S. attempts to wield rules and order to justify its own selfishness and hegemonic behavior, but who will believe it now?”

The end of 20 years of American security commitments in Afghanistan would appear to reinforce what observers say is a U.S. strategic shift toward the so-called Indo-Pacific superregion.

Reflected in Harris’ remarks on Tuesday was the Biden administration’s view that the maritime region is where the most significant developments will take place in the coming decades. American relationships with the likes of Singapore, Vietnam and the Philippines—and allies Japan and South Korea—are expected to be central to future U.S. engagement in Asia.

But the U.S. also recognizes the political sensitivities surrounding increased economic ties and security commitments in Southeast Asia. Many regional parties, while navigating maritime territorial disputes in the South China Sea, still count China among their largest trading partners.

Harris’ message to allies and partners was clear in emphasizing openness and inclusiveness, but it also singled out Beijing for criticism.

“I must be clear,” she said at Singapore’s Gardens by the Bay. “Our engagement in Southeast Asia and the Indo-Pacific is not against any one country, nor is it designed to make anyone choose between countries. Instead, our engagement is about advancing an optimistic vision that we have for our participation and partnership in this region. And our economic vision is a critical part of that.”

Original Articles: China Hits Back at Kamala Harris Rebuke With ‘America First’ Jibe (

15 thoughts on “China Goes After Kamala Harris”
  1. I really can’t blame China for going after Kamala, after all she is Vice President Laughing Hyena. Need I say more?


  3. Harris is NOT ELIGIBLE to be VP or POTUS as she is NOT a Natural Born Citizen, a requirement of our Constitution, as both her parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of her birth as they were in the US on a student’s visa and to date her father is still NOT a US Citizen.

  4. Great article. It is quite unfortunate that over the last ten years, the travel industry has had to fight terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, influenza, swine flu, as well as the first ever true global economic downturn. Through everything the industry has really proven to be sturdy, resilient and dynamic, locating new ways to deal with adversity. There are constantly fresh complications and opportunity to which the field must all over again adapt and act in response.

  5. I manage a vape shop directory and we have had a listing from a vape shop in the United States that additionally advertises CBD items. A Month later on, PayPal has written to use to say that our account has been limited and have requested us to remove PayPal as a payment method from our vape shop directory site. We do not offer CBD items like CBD oil. We merely provide advertising and marketing solutions to CBD companies. I have checked out Holland & Barrett– the UK’s Reputable Health and wellness Retail store and if you take a close look, you will witness that they promote a somewhat comprehensive variety of CBD goods, particularly CBD oil and they also happen to take PayPal as a payment solution. It appears that PayPal is employing contradictory standards to different firms. Because of this stipulation, I can no longer take PayPal on my CBD-related site. This has restricted my payment possibilities and currently, I am intensely contingent on Cryptocurrency payments and direct bank transfers. I have consulted with a barrister from a Magic Circle law firm in London and they said that what PayPal is doing is altogether against the law and inequitable as it ought to be applying a systematic criterion to all firms. I am yet to talk with one more legal representative from a US law practice in The city of london to see what PayPal’s legal position is in the USA. In the meantime, I would be very appreciative if anyone here at targetdomain could offer me with substitute payment processors/merchants that work with CBD firms.

  6. I believe you’re on the right course with your post. You’ve got a plenty of interesting web content that new visitors are going to appreciate.

  7. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share. Many thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *