Who Karmelo Anthony Family BLAMES For Murder Will Shock You!

A Texas murder verdict has now turned into a fight over race, jury fairness, and public trust in the courts.

Quick Take

Karmelo Anthony was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison after a Frisco track meet stabbing.^[1]^[4]
The jury reached its verdict in about three hours, which Anthony supporters quickly pointed to as suspicious.^[1]^[4]
Family spokesman Dominique Alexander said there was “not a single Black person on the jury” and claimed Black lives do not matter in Collin County.^[2]^[5]
Reporters and courthouse footage showed the case sparked heated reactions and sharp racial commentary outside the courtroom.^[2]^[3]

Verdict and Sentence Draw Sharp Lines

A Collin County jury convicted Karmelo Anthony of murder and gave him a 35-year sentence after the fatal stabbing of Austin Metcalf at a 2025 track meet.^[1]^[4] ABC News reported the jury reached the guilty verdict in about three hours.^[4] FOX 4 reported prosecutors called the killing unjustified murder and said Anthony provoked the confrontation.^[1] The fast decision gave the case instant fuel for both sides.^[1]^[4]

The defense had argued self-defense and sudden passion, but the jury rejected that account.^[1] That matters because the verdict was not based on a close split over whether a death happened. It was a direct rejection of the defense story. ABC News and ABC 7 both reported the jury did not accept Anthony’s self-defense claim.^[4] In plain terms, the panel believed the state’s version of events.

Spokesman Shifts Focus to Race

After sentencing, family spokesman Dominique Alexander attacked the panel and the county’s justice system.^[2]^[5] CBS Texas reported he said there was “not a single Black person on the jury” and that the case moved too fast for fair review.^[2] Newsmax reported he also said “black lives do not matter in Collin County.”^[5] That message landed hard with viewers who already distrust woke institutions and uneven treatment in the courts.

The race claim is powerful as a talking point, but the public record supplied here does not prove bias in jury deliberations.^[1]^[4] The materials show the jury’s composition was disputed in media coverage, and courthouse reaction clips described the panel as all-white.^[2]^[3] They do not show juror testimony, court findings, or a transcript proving racial discrimination in the verdict itself. That gap matters if the claim is meant to be more than a post-verdict accusation.

Why the Story Is Resonating

This case touches a nerve because many Americans have watched race be used to explain away outcomes they dislike.^[2]^[3] Here, the state had eyewitness testimony, the defense lost on self-defense, and the jury moved quickly.^[1]^[4] Supporters of Anthony still framed the result through race and jury makeup.^[2]^[3]^[5] That split shows how fast a criminal case can become a larger fight over legitimacy, fairness, and the left’s habit of racializing everything.

WATCH: Karmelo Anthony Family Spokesman Falsely Blames 'All-White' Jury for Guilty Murder Verdict, Claims 'Black Lives Do Not Matter in the Criminal Justice System' https://t.co/LgMiQZvi3f #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit

— Dianna Slonaker (@DiannaSlonaker) June 10, 2026

The broader issue is simple. If the jury pool was handled properly, the verdict stands on the evidence.^[1]^[4] If the defense believed Black jurors were wrongly excluded, that argument belongs in court records, not just in press comments.^[2]^[3] Right now, the supplied sources support the existence of a fierce public dispute, but they do not support a proven finding that race decided the case. What they do show is a media storm that left little room for calm judgment.