FBI Informant REVEALED – Infiltrated Newsom!

Gavin Newsom says Alexis Podesta was not in his orbit; the paper trail and court files say otherwise.

Story Snapshot

Newsom appointed Podesta to a paid state board seat in January 2020.
Federal filings and defense counsel identify Podesta as “Co-Conspirator 2,” uncharged and cooperating.
Reports say Podesta later wore an FBI wire inside Newsom’s political circle.
Newsom’s team defends the appointment, calls critics political, and stays vague on her status.

The official appointment that now haunts the defense

Governor Gavin Newsom placed Alexis Podesta on the State Compensation Insurance Fund board in January 2020. His office cited her prior service leading California’s Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency as proof of merit. That line reads clean. It also ties Podesta to Newsom by a signature and a paycheck. The governor’s staff now argues she was not in his orbit of the later fraud case. The appointment record is the hard fact critics wave in reply.

The Los Angeles Times reported a federal fraud case centered on Newsom’s former chief of staff Dana Williamson. The paper also reported Podesta’s attorney confirmed she is “Co-Conspirator 2,” uncharged and cooperating with federal authorities. That is not guilt, but it is proximity. It tells voters she was close enough to touch money flows and get named in plea papers. Newsom is not implicated in wrongdoing in that case, the Times noted.

The wire, the orbit, and the $61,000 problem

New York Post reporting says Podesta wore an FBI wire starting in 2024. Those stories describe her as inside Newsom’s circle while recording conversations tied to the probe. The same reports say she still sits on the insurance fund board and draws nearly $61,000 a year. Newsom’s office declined to discuss keeping her there, citing a personnel matter. That response invites the obvious question: if she is not in the orbit, why does the orbit keep paying her?

The Sacramento Bee has tracked Podesta’s continued service and her status as an unindicted co-conspirator, again confirmed by her attorney. The Bee notes she has cooperated with investigators and kept attending board meetings. This blends two truths that clash in public view. She is not charged. She also stayed in a state-paid role while federal agents mined her access. Voters judge both optics. Common sense says the paycheck and seat equal orbit, whatever the press shop claims.

What the indictment says and what it does not

Court filings tie Williamson to bank and tax fraud allegations and payments linked to a dormant campaign fund. The Times outlines the scheme timeline and notes Williamson pleaded not guilty when first charged. Podesta’s lawyer says she handled the account after Williamson left for the governor’s office, saw nothing unusual, and stopped payments when told they were improper. That account, if accurate, paints Podesta as a conduit who corrected course when warned, not a mastermind.

Where the bodies are buried in the biggest political and financial scandal in California history: The federal investigation of Greedy Gavin Newsom and his main squeeze "first partner" Jennifer Siebel Newsom and their inner circle, and the prosecution of state operatives linked to… pic.twitter.com/0L3zr0pqBl

— Saint James Hartline (@JamesHartline) July 3, 2026

Here is the split-screen. On one side, the governor’s team leans on process: official appointment, strong resume, no charges. On the other, media describe an informant wearing a wire inside the governor’s political world and a board member still on the payroll during the probe. The first screen asks for patience. The second screams hypocrisy. To many conservative readers, the fix is simple: pause the paycheck, clear the air, and prove the house can police itself.

What accountability would look like right now

Taxpayers deserve a timeline from the governor’s office. Lay out when they learned Podesta was an informant, when they reviewed her board role, and why they kept her in place. Confirm whether conflict checks flagged anything after the federal case surfaced. If Podesta truly acted to stop improper payments and then cooperated, say it plainly and back it with documents where possible. If the administration insists she is outside the orbit, match the words to the org chart and the checks.