This past week, climate change scientists, most of which are socialist Democrats, came out with a warning that manmade climate change is going to result in the extinction of 1 million species of plants and animals, unless we do something to reverse the trend.
I’m telling you right now that this is a socialist lie and I plead with you not to buy into that lie.
I’ve reported this before, but just a quick reminder that in the early 1960s, the United States and Russia met with the purpose of finding a unifying factor that could help lead to a one-world government. This took place during the short tenure of President John F. Kennedy. It was agreed upon that the threat of nuclear war was not sufficient to lead to their socialist goal, but the environment was. Even if there wasn’t any real environmental problem, they would create one. From that time until now, leftists, also known today as Democrats, have been pushing climate change to help push their socialist agenda.
We’ve been hearing about global warming and that it’s all man’s fault, but the leftists ignore the fact that history shows the earth has heated up, cooled down, heated up, cooled down and is now heating up again. It is a natural cyclic event that has been happening for centuries before man and his industrial revolution.
To help their cause of creating a global emergency, climate changers are now running around crying that one million species of plants and animals are currently threatened with extinction and that it’s all man’s fault.
how to write a good conclusion paragraph for a college essay what does viagra do to women research paper hot topics pay for assignment write my business case follow follow link https://eagfwc.org/men/tamiflu-viagra-cialis-levitra/100/ follow link simple cover letter for cvВ conclusion drugs essay do my autocad homework cialis arm pain allen overy case study interview viagra za muskarce forum http://jeromechamber.com/event/hillary-clintons-thesis/23/ college essay about changes in my life https://rainierfruit.com/taking-viagra-beta-blockers/ purchase literature review dissertation literature review purpose https://bigsurlandtrust.org/care/viagra-confezione-aperta/20/ click how to format a research paper apa https://thejeffreyfoundation.org/newsletter/middle-school-lab-report-format/17/ see kindle paperwhite how to download books viagra online prescription help writing a paper for college buy college research papers click cialis in contrassegno https://bonusfamilies.com/lecture/swot-essay/21/ DON’T BUY THEIR LIE!!!
Have you ever heard of natural selection?
The process of natural selection is not the driving force of evolution, as they claim. If one truly studies natural selection, it does one of two things – it keeps a population stable or it drives it to extinction. This has to do with genetic variability or the amount of change found in a species’ DNA.
As a population splits off, plant or animal, they lose some of their genetic variability. As this population further spreads out and divides it loses even more genetic variability. Eventually, there is not enough genetic variability to allow the plants or animals to adapt to any environmental changes, such as temperature, moisture, etc.
Let me give you an example. Dogs referred to as mutts (the products of numerous breeds breeding together) are by far the healthier dogs and the dogs that can more readily adapt to changes in their environment. However, many pure breeds, like a Maltese (we have 2) that have been pure bred for over 2,000 years, have many health problems and generally don’t live as long as a mutt, nor are they as easily adaptable to changes in their environment.
Thus, natural selection drives the species to extinction.
Another example is the cheetah. Many wildlife experts are worried that the cheetah could soon go extinct because it has virtually no genetic variability left, thus it cannot adapt to very much change to its environment.
On the flip side, when a population, especially a large population, stays in one general area, the genetic variability is passed from generation to generation and thus the population remains fairly stable. Additionally, these kinds of populations can readily adapt to many changes to their environment.
Thus, natural selection keeps the population stable.
I will admit that in some areas, the global warming or climate change is due in part to mankind. That’s in places like China and India where industrial pollution is so bad that the air is unsafe to breathe, forcing many people to wear masks.
In other areas, mankind has wiped out entire forests, eliminating the habitats for some plants and animals.
However, the vast majority of instances of animal and plant extinction is due to natural selection, the weapon that evolutionists swing like a sword. In truth, they know that, but they need the environmental crisis of climate change to force their socialist agenda not only on America but on the entire world. Please, PLEASE, PLEASE don’t buy into that the socialist lie of climate change and an immediate environmental emergency. It will only lead to the loss of all of our freedoms and rights and not that salvation of the animals, plants or earth.