Democrats are looking for yet another bite at the Mueller apple

Democrats and their media allies spent the better part of two years falsely convincing much of the American public that Trump was guilty of criminal collusion with Russia and subsequently, obstruction of justice.  You may recall how Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff stated that he had seen the evidence among the documents that were provided to the Congress – although he was prohibited from sharing the details and the documents.

Democrats predicted – as fact – that Special Counsel would present the evidence.  He did not – neither in his long-anticipated Report, his one, and only press conference nor during his testimony before two committees of Congress.

Coming off the much-hyped but ultimately disastrous congressional hearings with Mueller, Democrats are already looking for yet another bite at the apple.  They are hoping to get former White House Counsel Don McGahn to testify.  They are now claiming that he will provide the evidence that failed to surface in the Mueller Report, the press conference, and the hearings.  They simply cannot accept that there is no there, there – at least in terms of criminal culpability.

What can be added that has not already been reported in the media ad infinitum?   Of course, the answer is “not much.”  Many Democrats have long ago lost all hope of finding some smoking gun that will have the public clamoring for impeachment.  But they have made some progress.  Various polls suggest that public sentiment has shifted from 60 percent against impeachment to approximately 53 percent.

Democrats seem to believe that the more they can stage political performances with the same old script and the same characters, there is a chance that the public will bite on their stale bait.

So, how does McGahn fit into that strategy?  A bit of retrospective will help.

As counsel to President Trump, McGahn was privy to Trump’s legal issues – official and personal.  His more important role, however, was selecting all those conservative judges that Trump has been putting on the federal courts in record numbers – including two Supreme Court justices.  But that is another story.

In terms of the Mueller investigation, McGahn is the person who advised Trump not to fire Mueller, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the chef at the Trump Tower.

Now this is where the plot thickens. Democrats contend that Trump ordered McGahn to fire Mueller– and they allege that such a command would constitute obstruction of justice.  A more benign explanation is that Trump discussed such a possibility to gain McGahn’s legal advice.  At any rate, despite every effort by Democrats to put words into Mueller’s mouth, the Special Counsel has refused — again, refused – to say that Trump is guilty of criminal obstruction.  He left that decision to the Department of Justice.

The only thing that can be said for sure – factually – is that no one got fired.  Mueller stated in his Report and subsequently testified that no one had hindered his investigation.  In fact, Trump allowed McGahn to be interviewed by Mueller for more than 30 hours even though he could have claimed executive privilege to prevent such interrogation.

McGahn is mentioned 72 times in the Mueller Report – which in and of itself is not damning.  To Democrats, that alone makes him an important witness.  On the other hand, with so many references, it is unlikely that there is anything that McGahn can tell the Congress that has not already been summarized in the Report.

McGahn has shown no desire to testify and it is not certain that even a subpoena will get him before the committees of Congress.  Even though McGahn is now a private citizen, Trump can exert executive privilege on information relating to McGahn’s days in the White House.

So far, McGahn is not responding to the congressional subpoena.  Whether he will eventually be compelled to testify will have to be decided by the courts – and that could take months, even years to determine.  But for now, McGahn appears to be the Democrats best chance to regurgitate the collusion and obstruction issues.

Maybe McGahn will testify before Congress.  Maybe not.  But in pursuing yet another staged event to put on the same production may be wearing thin with the public.  It is starting to look like … excuse the expression … a witch-hunt.

So, there ‘tis.